The pandemic has created massive disruption for teachers and students, and the evidence that we have is showing that disadvantaged pupils are worst affected. Don’t be deceived – many of the challenges these students present are borne out of frustration and anxiety, and can be addressed by effective literacy teaching.
A key principle in managing a crisis is to go back to basics to ensure that everyone has their needs met. With that in mind, here are five principles to help you review your support of students’ literacy skills – fundamental to accessing the curriculum, and essential for life.
1. Prioritise reading across the school
Ensuring that children can read is the most fundamental duty of schools. This does not just apply to primary schools. Secondary students attend school for five years. That time ought to be more than enough to ensure that struggling readers are guided towards success and independence.
Many secondary teachers oppose reading interventions that encroach on their subject time. They may also fall into the trap of stereotyping, assuming that children cannot read because they lack intelligence. Almost invariably, students cannot read because they have not been taught as they needed to be.
All teachers need to understand that good reading brings a host of benefits, such as improved general knowledge, access to subject knowledge, confidence, improved behaviour, longer concentration and improved self-esteem. Improving reading markedly reduces disruption, frustration and avoidance behaviour. In short, it is in everyone’s interests to prioritise reading.
- Have a clear, unambiguous policy that reading underlies all academic success?
- Have a clear plan by school leaders to ensure that the policy is implemented?
- Have a member of the senior leadership team with direct responsibility for literacy strategy, interventions and progress?
2. Assess all students
There must be an effective system for screening all students – not just on arrival but throughout their time at school. There should also be a system for ensuring that new arrivals take part in screening as part of their school induction. After assessment of whole cohorts with standardised reading tests, those who score lower should then be assessed individually for decoding, comprehension and motivation. Likewise, standardised writing samples can be used to identify students who may have difficulties with handwriting, spelling, or sentence structure.
These practices ensure that no student is overlooked, which can happen surprisingly easily. Some students are very good at masking reading problems. Teacher referrals are not consistent or accurate enough to ensure that all students are identified and helped. Accurate screening systems can also help you to ensure that those who need help most get it first.
- Screen all students using a standardised test with a broad statistical base?
- Follow up low scorers with individual testing to check whether low scores are the result of decoding difficulties, comprehension difficulties, or low motivation?
- Train your staff to ensure that one-to-one testing produces reliable data?
3. Use validated teaching practices
Teaching reading is rocket science. Teachers must have a very good knowledge of the content – the code system of written English language – and of empirically based methods that have been proven to have a significant impact. Features of such practices are: carefully analysed content; high rates of student response; immediate, explicit error correction; guided practice to fluency; links between reading, spelling and written language; opportunities to generalise skills; and follow-up monitoring to ensure that gains are maintained.
For example, teaching Tier 2 vocabulary items can be integrated into lessons in a well-rehearsed, efficient framework that exposes students to 7 – 10 instances of the word in 30 – 60 seconds. Likewise, students need clear, unambiguous systems in place for learning to spell new words. Where they have difficulty with spelling known words, additional explicit instruction should be tightly focused on gaps revealed by detailed assessment. These sessions should be short, involve repeated practice of known words, even after they have been spelled correctly, and tracked closely. We have to minimise impact on the curriculum: students in the Last Chance Saloon of their education must not have their time wasted.
- Ensure that teachers and tutors understand the English orthographic system, and how it links to spoken language?
- Ensure that vocabulary teaching is planned, explicit and efficient?
- Ensure that reading intervention staff are trained in research-validated practices that accelerate progress?
- Ensure that student progress is closely monitored and that programmes are adjusted accordingly?
4. Be meticulously organised
Meticulous organisation of reading interventions is essential to ensure that the school’s resources are deployed to maximum effect, and that students get the maximum possible benefit from their literacy lessons. This organisation extends to communication, reporting, planning, record-keeping, resource management and the teaching environment.
- Ensure that all teachers involved with the student, as well as parents, are informed about reading support being given and that they are updated on progress regularly?
- Keep detailed records of each lesson so that problems are quickly identified and resolved?
- Keep resources, teaching plans and materials in meticulous order so that no time is wasted during lessons?
5. Monitor and evaluate in-depth
Student progress should be monitored systematically, not only in interventions but in whole-school practices – for example: reading logs, book presentations, reading passports, and comprehension activities. This is particularly important when we are trying to accelerate progress so that students catch up on lost ground. Break down the skills that they need to develop to accuracy and then fluency, and monitor progress on these daily if possible – for example, through short practice routines, starter activities or tightly focused end-of-lesson tests.
Students receiving intervention should be monitored on a lesson-by-lesson basis. Intervention programmes should be regularly evaluated based on student progress data, and adjustments or targeted training put in place where necessary.
- Have a straightforward system for teachers to monitor reading activity and progress in mainstream lessons?
- Keep lesson-by-lesson data on students receiving reading interventions, including graphic representations for high-impact feedback?
- Review and evaluate the impact of literacy intervention programmes, including updating training as a regular element of the evaluation cycle?
This post was updated and renamed on 1 November 2020
You may also be interested in: